Computer

Subject: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:25 pm

CPU Processor :AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Socket AM2, 3.1GHz, 64-Bit Dual-Core, 1MB Cache
Cooling Fan :AMD factory Auto-RPM Silent CPU Air Cool
System Board :GigaByte AMD 740G, AM2+, 4GB DDR2 Max, RAID, S/PDIF, Audio, GbLAN, Video. [ GA-MA74GM-S2 ]
RAM Memory :4G (2x2GB) PC6400 DDR2/800 Dual Channel
VGA :Geforce 9800GT: 1024MB
Hard Drive 1 : 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM

Is it worth $566 USD ?

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:28 pm

Andrew wrote:: CPU Processor :AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Socket AM2, 3.1GHz, 64-Bit Dual-Core, 1MB Cache
Cooling Fan :AMD factory Auto-RPM Silent CPU Air Cool
System Board :GigaByte AMD 740G, AM2+, 4GB DDR2 Max, RAID, S/PDIF, Audio, GbLAN, Video. [ GA-MA74GM-S2 ]
RAM Memory :4G (2x2GB) PC6400 DDR2/800 Dual Channel
VGA :Geforce 9800GT: 1024MB
Hard Drive 1 : 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM

Is it worth $566 USD ?

Processor is a little outdated But yeah it's worth it.

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:29 pm

hell yea xD get eets

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:30 pm

Saywha wrote:

Andrew wrote:: CPU Processor :AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Socket AM2, 3.1GHz, 64-Bit Dual-Core, 1MB Cache
Cooling Fan :AMD factory Auto-RPM Silent CPU Air Cool
System Board :GigaByte AMD 740G, AM2+, 4GB DDR2 Max, RAID, S/PDIF, Audio, GbLAN, Video. [ GA-MA74GM-S2 ]
RAM Memory :4G (2x2GB) PC6400 DDR2/800 Dual Channel
VGA :Geforce 9800GT: 1024MB
Hard Drive 1 : 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM

Is it worth $566 USD ?

Processor is a little outdated But yeah it's worth it.

Im mostly worried bout the VGA, is it enough to Run Wotlk with nice fps?s?

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:31 pm

Get EEET

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:31 pm

Andrew wrote:

Saywha wrote:

Andrew wrote:: CPU Processor :AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Socket AM2, 3.1GHz, 64-Bit Dual-Core, 1MB Cache
Cooling Fan :AMD factory Auto-RPM Silent CPU Air Cool
System Board :GigaByte AMD 740G, AM2+, 4GB DDR2 Max, RAID, S/PDIF, Audio, GbLAN, Video. [ GA-MA74GM-S2 ]
RAM Memory :4G (2x2GB) PC6400 DDR2/800 Dual Channel
VGA :Geforce 9800GT: 1024MB
Hard Drive 1 : 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM

Is it worth $566 USD ?

Processor is a little outdated But yeah it's worth it.

Im mostly worried bout the VGA, is it enough to Run Wotlk with nice fps?s?

Hell yes.

Im getting constant 60 FPS on a 9400 GT, Which wasn't made for gaming. 9800 would run it like a champ. But Vertical sync only lets my FPS Go up to 60, so...

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:32 pm

are you fucking kidding me?
you will be able to run at least 2 WoWs simultaneously at max FPS with this beast.

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:32 pm

My fps is bad its only 60 Sad

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:32 pm

Andrew wrote:: CPU Processor :AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Socket AM2, 3.1GHz, 64-Bit Dual-Core, 1MB Cache
Cooling Fan :AMD factory Auto-RPM Silent CPU Air Cool
System Board :GigaByte AMD 740G, AM2+, 4GB DDR2 Max, RAID, S/PDIF, Audio, GbLAN, Video. [ GA-MA74GM-S2 ]
RAM Memory :4G (2x2GB) PC6400 DDR2/800 Dual Channel
VGA :Geforce 9800GT: 1024MB
Hard Drive 1 : 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM

Is it worth $566 USD ?

By those that are highlighted in red, Yes.

saywha wrote:: Im getting constant 60 FPS on a 9400 GT, Which wasn't made for gaming. 9800 would run it like a champ. But Vertical sync only lets my FPS Go up to 60, so...

Vertical sync is meant to do that, It's your current monitor refresh rate (60hz) and prevents Tearing on monitor when playing FPS games that has alot of fast action movement (such as Counter-strike source)

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:32 pm

Wrathed wrote:: are you fucking kidding me?
you will be able to run at least 2 WoWs simultaneously at max FPS with this beast.

THIS!!!1111

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:34 pm

fico wrote:: My fps is bad its only 60

60 is what you should want... but honestly if you have a computer that cant run wow at 60 fps you need t o scrap it.

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:35 pm

Thanks for replies guys, really helped cheers

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm

Min0rity wrote:

Andrew wrote:: CPU Processor :AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Socket AM2, 3.1GHz, 64-Bit Dual-Core, 1MB Cache
Cooling Fan :AMD factory Auto-RPM Silent CPU Air Cool
System Board :GigaByte AMD 740G, AM2+, 4GB DDR2 Max, RAID, S/PDIF, Audio, GbLAN, Video. [ GA-MA74GM-S2 ]
RAM Memory :4G (2x2GB) PC6400 DDR2/800 Dual Channel
VGA :Geforce 9800GT: 1024MB
Hard Drive 1 : 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM

Is it worth $566 USD ?

By those that are highlighted in red, Yes.

saywha wrote:: Im getting constant 60 FPS on a 9400 GT, Which wasn't made for gaming. 9800 would run it like a champ. But Vertical sync only lets my FPS Go up to 60, so...

Vertical sync is meant to do that, It's your current monitor refresh rate (60hz) and prevents Tearing on monitor when playing FPS games that has alot of fast action movement (such as Counter-strike source)

Mm, i bought the monitor (19" LCD, Flatron) with the computer. Smile

I'm happy with 60 fps, i don't see the point in going any higher, Since there is no fps lag.

Subject: Re: Computer Sat 31 Jan 2009, 7:18 pm

Saywha wrote:

Min0rity wrote:

Andrew wrote:: CPU Processor :AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Socket AM2, 3.1GHz, 64-Bit Dual-Core, 1MB Cache
Cooling Fan :AMD factory Auto-RPM Silent CPU Air Cool
System Board :GigaByte AMD 740G, AM2+, 4GB DDR2 Max, RAID, S/PDIF, Audio, GbLAN, Video. [ GA-MA74GM-S2 ]
RAM Memory :4G (2x2GB) PC6400 DDR2/800 Dual Channel
VGA :Geforce 9800GT: 1024MB
Hard Drive 1 : 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM

Is it worth $566 USD ?

By those that are highlighted in red, Yes.

saywha wrote:: Im getting constant 60 FPS on a 9400 GT, Which wasn't made for gaming. 9800 would run it like a champ. But Vertical sync only lets my FPS Go up to 60, so...

Vertical sync is meant to do that, It's your current monitor refresh rate (60hz) and prevents Tearing on monitor when playing FPS games that has alot of fast action movement (such as Counter-strike source)

Mm, i bought the monitor (19" LCD, Flatron) with the computer. Smile

I'm happy with 60 fps, i don't see the point in going any higher, Since there is no fps lag.

I'm going to re-quote this.

Quote :: Vertical sync is meant to do that, It's your current monitor refresh rate (60hz) and prevents Tearing on monitor when playing FPS games that has alot of fast action movement (such as Counter-strike source

Which was in response to:

Quote :: But Vertical sync only lets my FPS Go up to 60, so...

Apparently here you was complaining about Vertical Sync letting your FPS at 60.
And y our 19" LCD monitor which i dont give a rats ass about is obviously running at 60Hz, and setting anything above or even exactly at it will cause major problems with screen refresh rate.
I know because i set ATI tools to exactly 60 Hz and fucked up visual until i had to disable it and then reconfigure it using the basic version.

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 4:20 am

Min0rity wrote:

Saywha wrote:

Min0rity wrote:

Andrew wrote:: CPU Processor :AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Socket AM2, 3.1GHz, 64-Bit Dual-Core, 1MB Cache
Cooling Fan :AMD factory Auto-RPM Silent CPU Air Cool
System Board :GigaByte AMD 740G, AM2+, 4GB DDR2 Max, RAID, S/PDIF, Audio, GbLAN, Video. [ GA-MA74GM-S2 ]
RAM Memory :4G (2x2GB) PC6400 DDR2/800 Dual Channel
VGA :Geforce 9800GT: 1024MB
Hard Drive 1 : 500GB SATA-II 7200RPM

Is it worth $566 USD ?

By those that are highlighted in red, Yes.

saywha wrote:: Im getting constant 60 FPS on a 9400 GT, Which wasn't made for gaming. 9800 would run it like a champ. But Vertical sync only lets my FPS Go up to 60, so...

Vertical sync is meant to do that, It's your current monitor refresh rate (60hz) and prevents Tearing on monitor when playing FPS games that has alot of fast action movement (such as Counter-strike source)

Mm, i bought the monitor (19" LCD, Flatron) with the computer. Smile

I'm happy with 60 fps, i don't see the point in going any higher, Since there is no fps lag.

I'm going to re-quote this.

Quote :: Vertical sync is meant to do that, It's your current monitor refresh rate (60hz) and prevents Tearing on monitor when playing FPS games that has alot of fast action movement (such as Counter-strike source

Which was in response to:

Quote :: But Vertical sync only lets my FPS Go up to 60, so...

Apparently here you was complaining about Vertical Sync letting your FPS at 60.
And y our 19" LCD monitor which i dont give a rats ass about is obviously running at 60Hz, and setting anything above or even exactly at it will cause major problems with screen refresh rate.
I know because i set ATI tools to exactly 60 Hz and fucked up visual until i had to disable it and then reconfigure it using the basic version.

Jesus fucking christ buddy. Didn't even plan on trolling you untill i saw your arrogant ass Confuse Sarcasm with complaining.

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 4:40 am

I play WoW with 15 fps on average and I get no lag unless it is server lag >:O

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 5:18 am

Neon Spotlight wrote:: I play WoW with 15 fps on average and I get no lag unless it is server lag >:O

Play on 60 fps and you'll never want to go back.

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 5:50 am

54X processors

Mark my words

that's a lot of cores with in 2 years

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 6:42 am

lulz,

my CPU:Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 3.0 GHz/ 1333FSB/ 12MB
Videocard: Radeon XFX 4870
Hard drive 1: 500GB raptor
Hard drive 2: 500GB raptor

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 8:06 am

112 fps in dalaran sup

...on my brother's computer =(

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 8:15 am

Ubberpownage88 wrote:: Get EEET

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 9:19 am

soluze wrote:: lulz,

my CPU:Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 3.0 GHz/ 1333FSB/ 12MB
Videocard: Radeon XFX 4870
Hard drive 1: 500GB raptor
Hard drive 2: 500GB raptor

No one cares about your computer spec.
We're talking about someone else getting a new computer and is not sure whenever its worth it or not.
So post something useful instead of "LO I HAS BETTER COMP LOOK:::::::: 20Twin -turbo powered quadro core"

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm

Lisyhalath wrote:: 112 fps in dalaran sup

...on my brother's computer =(

I assume dalaran is a new city they put in in wotlk, is it worse than shattrath for fps lag?

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 6:51 pm

Timewarp wrote:

Lisyhalath wrote:: 112 fps in dalaran sup

...on my brother's computer =(

I assume dalaran is a new city they put in in wotlk, is it worse than shattrath for fps lag?

Yea

Subject: Re: Computer Sun 01 Feb 2009, 7:04 pm

Dalaran has always been around just never opened to the public until WotLK. It was just rubble with random mobs and a huge bubble. It has now been improved into a lag fest