| Is this bannable... | |
|
+12HarryLoL Fe®g lolnicetry Catifan CaptainPlanetQQs Rabies Lupus Earz Serration bkhorizon ServerBot ~Starlight~ 16 posters |
|
Is/Should Rank 1 spells be bannable? | Yes | | 40% | [ 10 ] | No | | 44% | [ 11 ] | N00B it ain't bugged!!! | | 16% | [ 4 ] |
| Total Votes : 25 | | Poll closed |
|
Author | Message |
---|
~Starlight~ CIA
Number of posts : 556 Joined : 2009-05-02 Points : 6182 Reputation : -2
| Subject: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:00 pm | |
| Are using Rank 1 spells bannable? They do a little less than the full rank and have usually under a second cast time. Seems like bug abuse to me, and as we all know bug abusing is bannable. | |
|
| |
ServerBot CIA
Number of posts : 7646 Joined : 2008-05-22 Points : 8719 Reputation : 207
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:01 pm | |
| I am not going to vote because I do not know but I think it should be | |
|
| |
bkhorizon CIA
Number of posts : 739 Age : 32 Joined : 2009-04-11 Points : 6392 Reputation : 23
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:07 pm | |
| good question.
it seems like it would be abuse seeing as you are doing a little less damage, but your increased speed makes up for that... | |
|
| |
Serration Sentino
Number of posts : 43 Joined : 2009-05-08 Points : 5715 Reputation : -2
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:08 pm | |
| - bkhorizon wrote:
- good question.
it seems like it would be abuse seeing as you are doing a little less damage, but your increased speed makes up for that... Rank 1 spells are a non donor's only defense against a donor. Leave 'em be. | |
|
| |
Serration Sentino
Number of posts : 43 Joined : 2009-05-08 Points : 5715 Reputation : -2
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:10 pm | |
| - Stormblast wrote:
- I am not going to vote because I do not know but I think it should be
Nah, it shouldn't be. If that should be then using auto shot while moving should be too, no? Or is that different? | |
|
| |
Earz CIA
Number of posts : 1342 Age : 35 Joined : 2008-07-19 Points : 6433 Reputation : 3
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:11 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
bkhorizon CIA
Number of posts : 739 Age : 32 Joined : 2009-04-11 Points : 6392 Reputation : 23
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:12 pm | |
| Basically, when you think about it...
Abuse is categorized as anything that isn't supposed to happen and you use it for your benefit.
Rank 1 spells aren't ment to be used to gain an unfair advantage in PvP. Therefore, using it is abuse.
Thats at least how I think of it. | |
|
| |
Lupus CIA
Number of posts : 397 Age : 34 Joined : 2009-01-20 Points : 6109 Reputation : -9
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:17 pm | |
| - bkhorizon wrote:
- Basically, when you think about it...
Abuse is categorized as anything that isn't supposed to happen and you use it for your benefit.
Rank 1 spells aren't ment to be used to gain an unfair advantage in PvP. Therefore, using it is abuse.
Thats at least how I think of it. that's not the point. the point is that they do more damage than what they actually should , and that is what makes the so tempting for nubs to use. actually instant with a maximum of 1k dmg decrease. u do 4 where u 'd do 1 of rank 16 ( fireball e.g) = 20k - 1 fireball rank 16= best crit > 9k - 10k. | |
|
| |
Rabies CIA
Number of posts : 389 Age : 31 Joined : 2009-05-01 Points : 6015 Reputation : -38
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:20 pm | |
| No its just increased speed casting. | |
|
| |
~Starlight~ CIA
Number of posts : 556 Joined : 2009-05-02 Points : 6182 Reputation : -2
| |
| |
CaptainPlanetQQs Assassin
Number of posts : 77 Joined : 2009-04-05 Points : 5779 Reputation : -1
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:24 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
bkhorizon CIA
Number of posts : 739 Age : 32 Joined : 2009-04-11 Points : 6392 Reputation : 23
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:24 pm | |
| starlights ss's are proof enough that it should be classified as abuse....
its too op. and don't give me no QQ that it makes it more even against donors.
Donors pay to be op, your not supposed to be as good as them so don't say it makes it a fair advantage so it should be allowed.
Its clearly abuse. And just because a rank 16 crit is better then rank 1, doesnt matter. Crits don't happen EVERY one, for some its a low percentage, aka non-donors, the ones that use this.
| |
|
| |
~Starlight~ CIA
Number of posts : 556 Joined : 2009-05-02 Points : 6182 Reputation : -2
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:25 pm | |
| - Rabies wrote:
- No its just increased speed casting.
You only say that because you yourself abuse it as in the case of your mage. Also nice job trying to lie to me and telling me you had 5 haste buffs going on and the fireball was max rank and then using your max rank fireball then without anything buffing you you used rank 1 and said that was proof. Overall you just suck. | |
|
| |
Rabies CIA
Number of posts : 389 Age : 31 Joined : 2009-05-01 Points : 6015 Reputation : -38
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:26 pm | |
| Neon, ur abuser so dont talk about this anyomore. | |
|
| |
bkhorizon CIA
Number of posts : 739 Age : 32 Joined : 2009-04-11 Points : 6392 Reputation : 23
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:27 pm | |
| Somone hits his print screen button alot. >< | |
|
| |
~Starlight~ CIA
Number of posts : 556 Joined : 2009-05-02 Points : 6182 Reputation : -2
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:27 pm | |
| - Rabies wrote:
- Neon, ur abuser so dont talk about this anyomore.
Nice spelling, also I don't abuse. Give me some SS's of me abusing and I might start believing your little lies. Also I am not going to start a flame war with your grammatically challenged mind because this is a serious thread. | |
|
| |
Catifan Assassin
Number of posts : 52 Age : 33 Joined : 2009-03-28 Points : 5772 Reputation : 1
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:27 pm | |
| Its unfortunately impossible to prove soemone is using rank one anyway so theres no point even debating this. | |
|
| |
ServerBot CIA
Number of posts : 7646 Joined : 2008-05-22 Points : 8719 Reputation : 207
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:28 pm | |
| My mage in s2(All spec/Some donor) does like 5k rank 1 frostbolts crit lol and he has maybe 1.6-1.7k spell damage | |
|
| |
Lupus CIA
Number of posts : 397 Age : 34 Joined : 2009-01-20 Points : 6109 Reputation : -9
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:28 pm | |
| - bkhorizon wrote:
- starlights ss's are proof enough that it should be classified as abuse....
its too op. and don't give me no QQ that it makes it more even against donors.
Donors pay to be op, your not supposed to be as good as them so don't say it makes it a fair advantage so it should be allowed.
Its clearly abuse. And just because a rank 16 crit is better then rank 1, doesnt matter. Crits don't happen EVERY one, for some its a low percentage, aka non-donors, the ones that use this.
l2read, i said a rank 16 fireball crit would do a max of 10k, whereas 4-5 rank 1 fireballs would do like 20k or sth due to the speed being nearly instant and the damage being more than what it should be (is it the same as retail : no ) kkthxbai (i voted yes ofcourse) | |
|
| |
Rabies CIA
Number of posts : 389 Age : 31 Joined : 2009-05-01 Points : 6015 Reputation : -38
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:28 pm | |
| - Catifan wrote:
- Its unfortunately impossible to prove soemone is using rank one anyway so theres no point even debating this.
Thats true and also nab who wroted this is abuser of rank 1 and he abuses on priest. | |
|
| |
bkhorizon CIA
Number of posts : 739 Age : 32 Joined : 2009-04-11 Points : 6392 Reputation : 23
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:28 pm | |
| - Catifan wrote:
- Its unfortunately impossible to prove soemone is using rank one anyway so theres no point even debating this.
This is true, and it would be a pain to remove lower ranks because then you would have to modify all spells to not require the lower ranks, then you would have to fix the trainers...
So even if it is bannable, it would be hard to catch. | |
|
| |
lolnicetry CIA
Number of posts : 1056 Joined : 2009-05-07 Points : 6682 Reputation : -36
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:29 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
ServerBot CIA
Number of posts : 7646 Joined : 2008-05-22 Points : 8719 Reputation : 207
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:29 pm | |
| - Catifan wrote:
- Its unfortunately impossible to prove soemone is using rank one anyway so theres no point even debating this.
l2castspeed | |
|
| |
~Starlight~ CIA
Number of posts : 556 Joined : 2009-05-02 Points : 6182 Reputation : -2
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:30 pm | |
| - Catifan wrote:
- Its unfortunately impossible to prove soemone is using rank one anyway so theres no point even debating this.
I proved Rabies was using it, anyone with Quartz can easily discern if someone is using rank 1. And plus if they are casting something at about 1 second per cast then they are either talent stacking or rank 1 abusing, and both are pretty bad. | |
|
| |
CaptainPlanetQQs Assassin
Number of posts : 77 Joined : 2009-04-05 Points : 5779 Reputation : -1
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... Fri 08 May 2009, 4:31 pm | |
| I just checked this out on my little Haste shaman, and 0.4 Lightning bolts critting 4000 is way too op. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Is this bannable... | |
| |
|
| |
| Is this bannable... | |
|