| This is muh QQ thread | |
|
+7asetas Earz lolmachine srslol bacongrease2 Skulliedoo Convarion 11 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Convarion Noob
Number of posts : 3 Joined : 2009-05-25 Points : 5668 Reputation : -1
| Subject: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:11 am | |
| So here I go, on a rant about some classes I truley cannot stand... (I play a lock..)
Druids: Cannot stand them period, I dont care if they're on my team or what. On my team, they refuse to heal me; they love to just run around and spam moonfire; Anytime I'm about to kill something, they just spam moonfire and get the kill. On the oposing team, all they seem to do is heal themselves. lol they never die. 3 dots, crash chaos/shadowbolt. Not to mention druids take 0 skill to play. There are 3 methods to being a druid: The Moonkin spam moonfire tactic; The Tree Of Life never die tactic; and the unfortunate spam entangle until my friends show up tactic.
Rogues: Another class that takes 0 skill to play. Here is the entire solo strategy for rogues: - Quote :
- -stealth
-cheap shot -spam sinister strike/hemo -kidney shot -spam once again -distract and stealth -repeat -vanish -repeat
For BGs, however, when there are a lot of people, this is what rogues do: - Quote :
- -stealth
-wait for you to start fighting someone -ambush for 9-11k damage -spam -kidney shot -spam Nothing to them, they just like to stun you forever and do amazing 3-5k bursts of damage.
Mages: Silence, that's all I have to say. Ill get interrupted, silenced, polymorphed, frozen, and dazed whenever possible. Mages think they're sweet because they have 100 instant casts, not to mention the 'I win' macro, involving PoM and Pyro blast. Mages are scared little fools IMO. Let's spam Ice Lance until they get near me, then OH NOES I DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO, blink and polymorph.
Yes I understand these are all accepted PVP tactics, they just really annoy me. I'll gladly take retaliate against anything anyone has to say about Warlocks. /end rant
| |
|
| |
Skulliedoo CIA
Number of posts : 1706 Age : 33 Joined : 2008-05-17 Points : 6557 Reputation : 55
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:14 am | |
| Nothing about pala's? That's new. Perhaps you need to use pvp gear instead.
This appears to be a l2p issue.
| |
|
| |
Convarion Noob
Number of posts : 3 Joined : 2009-05-25 Points : 5668 Reputation : -1
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:16 am | |
| I do use pvp gear oO I dont think l2p counts when 3 someone's (wont mention any rogues and mage) camp the gy. It wouldnt have been so bad without the silence. | |
|
| |
Skulliedoo CIA
Number of posts : 1706 Age : 33 Joined : 2008-05-17 Points : 6557 Reputation : 55
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:19 am | |
| Let me guess, those 3 camping you were a druid, rogue and mage? You should use trinket / succubus seduction / voidwalker bubble at the right time vs rogue's, once you get a clear shot at them, they go down like flies. | |
|
| |
Convarion Noob
Number of posts : 3 Joined : 2009-05-25 Points : 5668 Reputation : -1
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:22 am | |
| nah, no druids. I only have problems with them if they're on my team. It was 2 rogues, 2x10k = 2k of my health left. haha | |
|
| |
bacongrease2 CIA
Number of posts : 2761 Age : 33 Joined : 2009-05-14 Points : 8595 Reputation : 69
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:45 am | |
| as a hunter the classes that annoy me the most are rogues and pally(bubbleftl) | |
|
| |
srslol CIA
Number of posts : 574 Joined : 2009-05-23 Points : 6231 Reputation : -6
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:46 am | |
| dude you really qq about druids rogues and mages O.o ??? and btw if you get hitted my 9k-11k ambushes you play vs donats or dont have pvp gear. and what say more about locks ? i try take it like you, the can spam ppl in guru full with 3k ticking dots and port away ? chaosbolt do 9k crits with full pvp gear. and i heard dot dot dot dot fear dot dot dot fear take skill. and if you lose vs mages and druids as lock you just suck. and rogues should be easy too, if you can play.... | |
|
| |
srslol CIA
Number of posts : 574 Joined : 2009-05-23 Points : 6231 Reputation : -6
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:47 am | |
| btw there some classes that arent that easy to beat, for every class only for palas not = I ....so if you qq that you lose vs THIS classes.....reroll pala and ´´pwn´´. | |
|
| |
bacongrease2 CIA
Number of posts : 2761 Age : 33 Joined : 2009-05-14 Points : 8595 Reputation : 69
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:50 am | |
| - srslol wrote:
- btw there some classes that arent that easy to beat, for every class only for palas not = I ....so if you qq that you lose vs THIS classes.....reroll pala and ´´pwn´´.
pfft i dont wanta be a shitadin no challenge | |
|
| |
srslol CIA
Number of posts : 574 Joined : 2009-05-23 Points : 6231 Reputation : -6
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 3:59 am | |
| Rogue view: (oh yes, i am bored)
Paladins: no chance if he isnt complete retarded winchance: 0%-10%
Warriors: if he is fury ez mod, if ms /sit and if prot > dodge block parry winchance 30% (80% if fury)
Locks: pve geared locks are pretty ez mod, but if skilled and good geared they are hard winchance: 40%-80%
Priests: can be only bit hard if constantly spam holy nova winchance 70%-90%
Shamans: pretty easy becaus eyou can intereupt a lot winchance: 80%
Hunter: if skilled can be hard if not easy.winchance 60%-70%
Mages: very fun fight....for the mage if youre not shs winchance 50%
Druid: oomkins and trees sucks (or at least i didnt see good one) but feral is hard. winchance: 60-70% and 40% if feral.
Dks: if he is bad you have a chance if not, /sit. 20%-50%
Rogues: 60% and 90% with first hit :> | |
|
| |
srslol CIA
Number of posts : 574 Joined : 2009-05-23 Points : 6231 Reputation : -6
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 4:00 am | |
| - bacongrease2 wrote:
- srslol wrote:
- btw there some classes that arent that easy to beat, for every class only for palas not = I ....so if you qq that you lose vs THIS classes.....reroll pala and ´´pwn´´.
pfft i dont wanta be a shitadin no challenge if you want chalange play priests, lolhemo rogues, fire mages or oomkin without lolfire or gayfall spam. | |
|
| |
lolmachine Assassin
Number of posts : 88 Joined : 2009-04-05 Points : 5803 Reputation : 0
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 4:30 am | |
| You can whine to eternity, but this is what Blizzard says: I believe we have offered the justification before, but to reiterate it, we designed WoW to be a group-based game. You participate through much of the content, especially the end-game content, as a team. If we had developed a 1v1 game, we would have made some of the mechanics work very differently. In a 1v1 game for example, healing would have to be far weaker such that a single healer could not overcome a single damage-dealer. (Currently a 5-player dungeon or Arena team needs but one healer for the entire group.) Abilities, particularly the crowd-control, would have to be much less powerful because there would be nobody to help you out. It is likely that class abilities and stats would have to be a lot more homogenized because basically you are compressing all of the roles and strengths of the entire team into one player. That's not to say you don't come into 1v1 scenarios sometimes even when you're participating as a team. But we don't expect those to be as balanced as larger group interactions.
I'm not sure what the foundation stone of all pvp is to which you refer. Many competitive sports would not be nearly as interesting (nor likely as balanced) in a 1v1 setting. Consider (American) football. Would you put a defensive linesman against a receiver? Does that even make sense? It's designed to be a group sport. WoW is designed for the most part to be a group-based game.
Compared to a lot of MMOs you can experience a lot of WoW's content while solo, but it should be obvious that we don't offer 1 player Arena team or 1 player raids for a reason. | |
|
| |
srslol CIA
Number of posts : 574 Joined : 2009-05-23 Points : 6231 Reputation : -6
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 4:31 am | |
| just cool that atm whole group pvp is about who got more palas and who abuse more... here. | |
|
| |
Earz CIA
Number of posts : 1342 Age : 35 Joined : 2008-07-19 Points : 6433 Reputation : 3
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 4:33 am | |
| Where's the fun if it wasn't difficult? | |
|
| |
lolmachine Assassin
Number of posts : 88 Joined : 2009-04-05 Points : 5803 Reputation : 0
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 4:36 am | |
| - srslol wrote:
- just cool that atm whole group pvp is about who got more palas and who abuse more... here.
Well, nothing's real on this server. Most classes don't work properly. I dressed up in full PvP gear on my frost mage and I found this destro lock with like 25k hp. I lost horribly, because some core skills don't work (water elemental nova, blink jumping instead of porting, etc.). You can say arcane works, but arcane is mindless. | |
|
| |
srslol CIA
Number of posts : 574 Joined : 2009-05-23 Points : 6231 Reputation : -6
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 4:45 am | |
| - lolmachine wrote:
- srslol wrote:
- just cool that atm whole group pvp is about who got more palas and who abuse more... here.
Well, nothing's real on this server. Most classes don't work properly. I dressed up in full PvP gear on my frost mage and I found this destro lock with like 25k hp. I lost horribly, because some core skills don't work (water elemental nova, blink jumping instead of porting, etc.). You can say arcane works, but arcane is mindless. hm locks arent that hard without pets for mages, but agree with you. | |
|
| |
lolmachine Assassin
Number of posts : 88 Joined : 2009-04-05 Points : 5803 Reputation : 0
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 4:50 am | |
| - srslol wrote:
- lolmachine wrote:
- srslol wrote:
- just cool that atm whole group pvp is about who got more palas and who abuse more... here.
Well, nothing's real on this server. Most classes don't work properly.
I dressed up in full PvP gear on my frost mage and I found this destro lock with like 25k hp. I lost horribly, because some core skills don't work (water elemental nova, blink jumping instead of porting, etc.). You can say arcane works, but arcane is mindless. hm locks arent that hard without pets for mages, but agree with you. On this server they're hard. On retail they're way easier. | |
|
| |
asetas CIA
Number of posts : 306 Age : 32 Joined : 2009-01-30 Points : 6079 Reputation : -2
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 4:51 am | |
| to be a good rogue takes skill oO As in every class... For instance pala is a easy class. But takes skill to be really good with it. When someone is good with a some class, you'll notice it. Btw.. they are called Ksers and let them be If you haven't noticed the BG matches here are anyways stupid.. | |
|
| |
jack5577 CIA
Number of posts : 1714 Age : 34 Joined : 2008-12-11 Points : 6365 Reputation : -9
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 4:58 am | |
| You fail so hard. Rogues take A LOT of skill | |
|
| |
Juicy CIA
Number of posts : 2649 Age : 33 Joined : 2009-03-10 Points : 7874 Reputation : 81
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 5:02 am | |
| - Skulliedoo wrote:
- Nothing about pala's? That's new.
Perhaps you need to use pvp gear instead.
This appears to be a l2p issue.
L2P issue indeed. Your playing a Warlock, Rogue is Your mofoing Nemesis yo. Dont expect to Soulfire Spam people down like before. | |
|
| |
srslol CIA
Number of posts : 574 Joined : 2009-05-23 Points : 6231 Reputation : -6
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 5:04 am | |
| rogue isnt locks nemesis since wotlk ... | |
|
| |
Juicy CIA
Number of posts : 2649 Age : 33 Joined : 2009-03-10 Points : 7874 Reputation : 81
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 5:05 am | |
| - srslol wrote:
- rogue isnt locks nemesis since wotlk ...
Still is yo! But Warlocks are fcking ezmode in retail to play. Destruction takes no skill anymore. ;> | |
|
| |
lolmachine Assassin
Number of posts : 88 Joined : 2009-04-05 Points : 5803 Reputation : 0
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 5:11 am | |
| - srslol wrote:
- rogue isnt locks nemesis since wotlk ...
Rogues were the locks' nemesis to a wider extend than in TBC at the start of WoTLK. Then they moved SL down and they became better, but they're still weak against rogues. | |
|
| |
srslol CIA
Number of posts : 574 Joined : 2009-05-23 Points : 6231 Reputation : -6
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 5:15 am | |
| with pvp gear and bit hp gems locks pwn rogues =/ | |
|
| |
uduandy CIA
Number of posts : 647 Age : 38 Joined : 2008-06-14 Points : 6140 Reputation : -8
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread Mon 25 May 2009, 5:37 am | |
| You must play with bad players if you can complain through stereotyping like this. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: This is muh QQ thread | |
| |
|
| |
| This is muh QQ thread | |
|